3189 items (3189 unread) in 36 feeds
news_mainstream_english
(734 unread)
news_alternative_english
(816 unread)
news_alternative_hebrew
(56 unread)
blogs_israel_english
(435 unread)
blogs_lebanon_english
(20 unread)
blogs_palestin_english
(10 unread)
blogs_usa
(529 unread)
blogs_others
(324 unread)
blogs_iran_english
(265 unread)
news_alternative_english (150 unread)
Kyrgyzstan Hosting Iran, US, Afghan, Kazakh, Pakistani Military Exercise
News number: 870429121818:55 | 2008-07-19
http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=8704291218
TEHRAN (FNA)- An international computer command-post exercise codenamed
"Regional Cooperation 2008" is being held in Kyrgyzstan from 15 to 24 July.
Kyrgyz, Afghan, Kazakh, Pakistani and Iranian servicemen are participating
in the maneuvers.
The drill takes place in line with a plan of bilateral military contacts
between the Kyrgyz armed forces and the US Central Command, Kyrgyz Defense
Ministry's press service told the Interfax news agency today.
The exercise consists of two parts: theoretical, which was held on 15-17
July with the use of computer technologies, and practical, which began at
the Kyrgyz Defense Ministry's officers and warrant officers training centre
on 18 July.
The drills provide for exercising interaction between various groups,
including intelligence services, an operational group, a logistics division,
media outlets and a humanitarian group involved in clearing up the aftermath
of emergency situations.
"Free Gaza" initiative to try and enter Gaza by sea and open port
Date: 19 / 07 / 2008 Time: 14:58
www.maannews.net/en/index.php?opr=ShowDetails&ID=30657
Bethlehem - Ma'an - A small shipping vessel will set sail for Gaza from
Cyprus on 5 August expecting to be illegally detained as it enters Gazan
waters.
The waters off the Gaza Strip are patrolled by Israeli naval vessels, and
Israel enforces a "Fishing Limit" that is 6 nautical miles (11.1 km) from
the Gaza shore. These restrictions on access and borders are enforced
despite the 2005 Israeli "disengagement" from the Gaza Strip.
There will be 60 people aboard the "Free Gaza" vessel including a Holocaust
survivor a survivor of the Palestinian Nakba, and members of the
international Palestinian diaspora.
The crew intends to travel into the Gaza strip, past the international
waters boundary, the 1996 Oslo accords boundary (20 nautical miles from the
Gaza coast), the 2002 Bertini agreement boundary (12 nautical miles and 22.2
km from the Gaza coast) and the current "Fishing Limit" imposed by the
Israeli navy since October 2006.
Legally, the group says there should be no problem passing each of these
lines since Israel disengaged from the Gaza strip in 2005 and should no
longer its control airspace and territorial waters.
The initiative hopes to draw attention to the continued de facto occupation
of Gaza. In an interview with Ma'an on Saturday, a spokesperson for the
group in Israel said that the crew expects to be stopped by the Israeli navy
shortly after they cross from international waters into Gazan territorial
waters, which according to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the
Sea, extend 12 nautical miles (22.2 km) from an area's shoreline.
While Israel has not signed the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, they
did sign the Bertini Agreement in August 2002 with the UN, which stated that
Gazan territory extended the full 12 nautical miles from the shore.
In June 2005, Israel unilaterally "disengaged" from Gaza and withdrew all
troops to the 1967 borders. In theory, Gazans control the entire Strip,
excluding approximately 650 meters along the eastern border which is called
a buffer and "no go" zone.
The trip organizers think one of four things will happen to the ship: it may
be stopped as it crosses or approaches the barrier marking the international
waters boundary, in which case the crew is prepared to stay on board for at
least two weeks in protest of the illegal halt of passage. The second
possibility envisioned by the organizers is that the ship will be allowed to
pass into the area, and will be stopped in the territorial waters. In this
eventuality the crew expects to be arrested, and the ship dragged to shore.
A third possibility is that the ship will be sunk by the navy.
The final option is that the ship actually makes it through to the Gaza port
near Gaza City in the north of the Strip.
According to Holocaust survivor and crew member Hedy Epstein, in the event
that they can get through to Gaza they will "open the port, fish with the
fishermen, help in the clinics, and work in the schools."
What Epstein hopes to do on this journey is to "remind the world that we
will not stand by and watch 1.5 million people suffer death by starvation
and disease."
Coordinator of the Popular Committee Against the Siege, Palestinian
Legislative Council member and lawyer Jamal Al-Khudari said that he hopes
the arrival of the ship in Gaza will mean an end to the siege. He emphasized
that the ship has a right to enter the local waters and Gazans have the
right to host their guests without Israeli intervention.
Opening a port in Gaza would allow residents to export agricultural
products, and gain control over the goods and material brought into the
region. Currently, all crossing points are controlled by Israel and Egypt.
The truce between Hamas and Israel was supposed to see the blockade and
restriction on essential goods lifted, but food, medical supplies, cement
and fuel are still only trickling in.
The ship was invited to Gaza by the Palestinian Red Crescent Society in the
Gaza Strip, the Palestinian Medical Relief Society, the Palestinian Centre
for Human Rights and the Gaza Community Mental Health Program, and support
for the initiative was provided in part from Carter Center in the US and
Archbishop Desmond Tutu.
Dr Aaron Lerner - IMRA: So much for the argument that if we had only
released Kuntar years ago that all our problem would have ended.
Hizbullah won't rule out more abductions
Jul. 19, 2008 JPost.com Staff , THE JERUSALEM POST
www.jpost.com
/servlet/Satellite?cid=1215331021764&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
Hizbullah's deputy secretary-general, Sheikh Naim Kassem, would not rule out
on Saturday the abduction of more Israeli soldiers in order to achieve the
organization's goals.
"I won't speak about this issue, because it has to do with military activity
in the struggle with Israel and with the question of whether this
confrontation will demand such an action," Kassem said in an interview to
Qatari newspaper Al-Arab. "These are details which will become known in the
future. We no longer have a 'prisoner file' but one cannot say what future
developments will be."
Kassem added that Hizbullah was in a state of war with Israel, which he said
was still occupying the Shaba Farms, the village of Ghajar and the Kfar
Shuba hills. "Israel continues to infiltrate Lebanese airspace and thus
poses a real threat," he said.
The leader said that Hizbullah's prisoner exchange deal with Israel had
"opened the door" for the Palestinians to demand a high price for the
release of kidnapped IDF soldier Gilad Schalit, who is being held by Hamas
in the Gaza Strip.
Kassem said Hizbullah had yet to exact revenge for the assassination of
military commander Imad Mughnyieh in February, and hinted that this would
happen when certain "circumstances" are right.
July 19th, 2008
IDF SPOKESPERSON'S ANNOUNCEMENT
Terrorist killed on July 10th was Head of Hamas Charity Foundation
Now released for publication: The Palestinian terrorist who shot and wounded
an Israeli civilian near the Israeli community of Yaqir on July 7th, 2008,
is Mahmoud O'ttaman Mahmoud A'azi, 48, from Qarawat Bani Hassan village.
A'azi was the head of a source of funding for Hamas' terror activities, the
"Islamic Charity Foundation," in his village, and in the past was amongst
the heads of the terror organization in the Samaria region. An IDF officer,
who was moderately wounded by the terrorist during an exchange of fire,
identified the terrorist's location, opened fire, and killed him.
So Much for the 'Looted Sites'
By MELIK KAYLAN
The Wall Street Journal July 15, 2008; Page D9
http://online.wsj.com:80/article/SB121607917797452675.html?mod=2_1580_topbox
A recent mission to Iraq headed by top archaeologists from the U.S. and U.K.
who specialize in Mesopotamia found that, contrary to received wisdom,
southern Iraq's most important historic sites -- eight of them -- had
neither been seriously damaged nor looted after the American invasion. This,
according to a report by staff writer Martin Bailey in the July issue of the
Art Newspaper. The article has caused confusion, not to say consternation,
among archaeologists and has been largely ignored by the mainstream press.
Not surprising perhaps, since reports by experts blaming the U.S. for the
postinvasion destruction of Iraq's heritage have been regular fixtures of
the news.
Up to now, it had seemed a clear-cut case. It stood to reason that a chaotic
land rich with artifacts would be easy to loot and plunder. Ergo, the
accusations against the U.S., the de facto governing authority, had been
taken on faith. No one had bothered to challenge the reports, the evidence
or the logic, not least because many ancient sites were in hostile terrain
and couldn't be double-checked. By implication, the U.S. had been blamed for
that too: After all, the presiding authority is effectively responsible for
allowing no-go areas to exist where such things can occur.
Yet, paradoxically, there always was thought to be enough evidence to adduce
blame. "We believe that every major site in Southern Iraq is in serious
danger," Donny George, the former head of the Baghdad Museum, was quoted as
saying in the New York Times in 2003. A recent book by Lawrence Rothfield of
the University of Chicago's Cultural Policy Institute carried the estimate
that, every year, roughly 10% of Iraq's heritage was being destroyed.
One of the foremost specialists who went on the trip, Elizabeth Stone from
Stony Brook University, actually quantified the damage with the help of
satellite images -- just before going. Alarmingly, and prematurely it seems,
she concluded that nearly 10 miles of land had been looted and hundreds of
thousands of objects had been taken. Confident statistics of this kind have
been regularly tossed around, yet one wonders how such calculations can be
made, not least by viewing the remains of illicit digs from satellite
pictures. When looters attacked the Baghdad Museum in 2003, the news media
put the number of destroyed and looted objects at 170,000 -- a figure equal
to the entire collection. It emerged later that most of the important pieces
had been successfully hidden away. Others were soon found. The number of
missing objects that is cited has since fluctuated between 3,000 and 15,000,
with the figure never taking into account the systematic semiofficial
looting and frequent substituting with fakes that occurred in Saddam's time.
Considering the political impact of such data, one would expect the experts
to approach the subject with scientific circumspection, using numbers
sparingly and conservatively. Too often they seem to have done the reverse.
So now, as a matter of course, their method, their probity in sifting the
evidence -- do they have a political agenda? -- has come into question.
It's a question that equally hangs over the deliberations of a meeting that
took place recently in Dublin of the World Archeological Congress. The
members reportedly considered a lengthy statement urging colleagues to
refuse any military requests for a list of Iran's sites that should be
exempt from possible air strikes.
Finally they settled for a shorter July 11 press release. Among other
things, the final press release says that WAC "expresses strong opposition
to aggressive military action . . . by the U.S. government, or by any other
government." The release quotes WAC's president as saying that WAC "strongly
opposed the war in Iraq and . . . we strongly oppose any war in Iran" and
that "any differences with Iran should be resolved through peaceful and
diplomatic means."
If as scholars, archeologists take a priori public positions on political
matters, what are we to make of the field-data they produce? How impartial
can it be? And with their own credibility marred, who is there left as an
impartial body of experts for the public to turn to?
The archaeologists' mission to southern Iraq took place in early June.
Besides Prof. Stone, the experts included John Curtis, head of the British
Museum's Middle East Department; Paul Collins, a Mesopotamia specialist at
that museum; a top German expert; and Iraqi experts. It was conducted
through the British military, which is in charge of the area, using a
helicopter and armed escorts to visit the locations. They included such
celebrated "cradle of civilization" sites as Ur, Eridu (the earliest
Sumerian city), Warka (Sumerian Uruk), Larsa (a Babylonian city), Tell
el-Ouelli (ancient Ubaid) and Tell el-Lahm (an Assyrian site).
According to the Art Newspaper article, "The international team . . . had
been expecting to find considerable evidence of looting after 2003 but to
their astonishment and relief there was none. Not a single recent dig hole
was found at the eight sites, and the only evidence of illegal digging came
from holes which were partially covered with silt and vegetation, which
means they [were] several years old." Furthermore, the most recent damage
"probably dated back to 2003," to just before and after the invasion when
the Iraqi army maneuvered for the allied attack. (According to other
experts, looting probably took place when the Iraqi army first moved out of
areas near sites to counter the invasion.)
Neither the British Museum pair nor Prof. Stone responded to my calls
seeking comment. The British Museum press official for the Middle Eastern
department cautioned that the official report had not yet been compiled, but
it seemed that the article was generally accurate. Certainly none of the
experts have denied any of it. In the article, Dr. Curtis "admits that he
was 'very surprised' at the lack of recent looting, but stresses that . . .
'it may not be typical of the country as a whole, and the situation could be
worse further north.'"
No doubt. But how could previous assessments have been so wrong, and why
would one expect anything to be worse elsewhere? In phone conversations with
me, both Donny George and Lawrence Rothfield argued that the eight sites
were all known to be well-protected. Dr. George was able to itemize each
one: "Ur was an Iraqi airbase and then a U.S. airbase. Uruk Warka was
protected by guards from nearby tribes -- we always knew that. Ouelli is
largely prehistoric and of no use to looters. . . ." And so on. But Dr.
George, perhaps the world's leading authority on the subject, also conceded
that the greatest damage done by looters had generally occurred in the
1990s, in Saddam's time. Prof. Rothfield said that the no-fly zones back
then had allowed illicit digging to occur.
The mission also refuted the welter of news items we've all become familiar
with accusing allied forces of damaging ancient sites with emplacements,
tank tracks and the like. According to the Art Newspaper report, "little
damage was . . . caused by coalition forces." Much of it was done by
Saddam's forces.
One is left with these questions: If the visited sites were known to be
well-protected, why did the team choose only those sites, and why were team
members surprised at the lack of damage? It has been hard to get convincing
answers. Some have speculated that, to get further cooperation, the visitors
made a tacit deal with the British authorities not to raise a scandal. Dr.
George felt that perhaps the eight were the only sites with adequate
security, while he couldn't explain the surprise expressed by the experts.
He warned against putting too much faith in newspaper reporting. Quite
right.
But it is all a far cry from the hitherto prevailing impression abroad in
the world that the invasion has directly led to the mass destruction of
Iraq's archaeological heritage.
========
Mr. Kaylan writes about the arts and culture for the Journal.
SALAFI JIHADISTS IN GAZA
'Compared to Us, Hamas Is Islamism Lite'
By Ulrike Putz in the Gaza Strip SPIEGEL ONLINE 07/18/2008 05:33 PM
www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,566740,00.html
Global power is their goal, and they are willing to slaughter innocents to
get there. A group of ultra-radical Islamists are training in the Gaza
Strip, and SPIEGEL ONLINE met with one of their leaders.
It's not easy to find a place to meet the man who goes by the name of Abu
Mustafa. A number of places were agreed on and jettisoned. Finally, after
hours of cruising around Gaza City with Abu Mustafa's driver, the call came.
The meeting would take place on the beach. There are enough people on the
beach that one doesn't attract so much attention, the caller explained. How
absurd this notion was would soon become clear.
Most people don't stick out on the beaches of Gaza to the degree that Abu
Mustafa does. He picks his way across the sand on crutches, his leg wrapped
in a cast up to his thigh. The Pakistani clothes he wears are also
foreign -- and the white shirt that hangs to his knees makes walking on
crutches even more difficult. Finally he slumps in a plastic chair. "Peace
be upon you," he says quietly, welcoming his guest.
Many people would like to speak with Abu Mustafa these days -- he guesses
about 10 men call him each day. Abu Mustafa holds the key to an ideology
that many are turning to in the Gaza Strip: Salafist jihadism, a belief in
the most radical form of Islam. "We meet secretly in mosques and private
homes," says Abu Mustafa, who has become an entry point to the movement for
many. He says the Salafis now number up to 5,000 people, not counting the
women and children.
'A Very Dangerous Man'
"We aren't well enough organized yet, but we are in the process of building
networks," says the 33-year-old. Eventually, he hopes, a powerful movement
will be born. Members are already receiving weapons training and are
schooled in both dogma and strategy. "When the fight begins, they will show
no mercy," said a middleman for the interview -- himself a fighter in an
armed militia -- prior to the beach meeting. "Abu Mustafa is a very
dangerous man."
Salafis -- sometimes referred to as Wahhabis -- dream of a world before
Islam became cluttered with new innovations and cultural influences. They
seek to live a pious, god-fearing life governed by the laws of religion, a
life resembling those of the original Muslims. At first glance, such a
belief system doesn't differ much from that of other utopian sects -- were
it not for their ideas related to holy war. To make their vision a reality,
Abu Mustafa and his men are willing to fight -- and they are willing to
slaughter innocent bystanders.
"Look," says Abu Mustafa, whose beard cascades down his chest, "there will
be three possibilities. Some will find their way to Islam. Those who don't
want to
convert will be able to live in peace under the authority of Islam." For
those who don't want to accept the hegemony of Islam, however, holy war is
the only recipe. "Then we have to fight -- just like our brothers on Sept.
11," Abu Mustafa says.
The attacks on New York and Washington, D.C. seven years ago were a response
to the contempt held for Islam by the Western world, he says. "If Muslims
are attacked anywhere in the world, one has to hit back, and it doesn't
matter where." Salafist Islam is like a cat, he says. "It is very friendly,
but if it is attacked, it turns into a tiger."
The True Islam
"We feel just like al-Qaida and we think as they do," Abu Mustafa says. He
won't say if he has contact with Osama bin Laden's terror group, but calls
it vaguely "a possibility." He also dodges the question of whether
foreigners have joined the Salafist movement in the Gaza Strip.
Abu Mustafa is not fond of speaking with journalists. It is still risky for
the group to come out of hiding, since Hamas -- the Palestinian Islamist
group which controls the Gaza Strip -- views Salafis with suspicion. Both
groups claim to represent true Islam, and both compete for the same
followers. The fact that Abu Mustafa finally agreed to a meeting with
SPIEGEL ONLINE comes out of gratitude, he says. "I owe the Germans a lot,"
he explains in his slow, careful German.
Abu Mustafa has a degree from the University of Saarbrucken in Germany's far
west. For seven years, until 2000, he studied chemical engineering and led a
largely normal student existence. He had periodic jobs with a moving company
or in construction, and he occasionally cooked up Palestinian specialties
for other students living in the dormitory. "I miss Germany," he says. He's
even looked on Google Earth for the street where he used to live and the
cafeteria where he used to eat.
He explains that he was largely accepted in Germany and found people there
to be quite friendly. The only problems came about when he encountered
scantily clad women or fellow students who spent much of their time in clubs
and bars. He says such experiences rooted him even deeper in his beliefs.
"It would be better for such people were they to follow the pure Islam," he
says. "We are going to try and bring the faith to them."
The Salafi warns that Germany, by supporting Israel and participating in
operations in Afghanistan, is a clear target for his fellow Islamists. He
claims he himself would never move against his "second home," but he warns
that "Germany should be afraid of being attacked."
Struggle for Global Influence
Salafis from the Gaza Strip first stepped into the global spotlight in March
2007, when jihadis from Jaish al-Islam (Army of Islam) kidnapped BBC
journalist Alan Johnston, who was based in the Gaza Strip. The group is a
small faction among Salafis. They held Johnston hostage for four months,
threatening to kill him and showing images of him wearing a suicide belt.
Abu Mustafa says it was a legitimate tactic in the struggle for Islam. "It
was nothing personal. It was a message to the West that they should release
imprisoned Muslims." For the moment, he adds reassuringly, foreign
journalists are not in danger in the Gaza Strip.
Indeed, Abu Mustafa says, he and his comrades in arms realize they need to
be patient. There's a long way to go before they can begin their struggle
for global influence. First, they have to take care of an enemy closer to
home: Hamas.
So far, Hamas has done what it can to keep the Salafis under control. They
know the ultra-radicals are just waiting to take over Hamas' position of
leadership. "They are traitors," Abu Mustafa says of Hamas. "Compared to us,
they are Islamism lite."
Nevertheless, he's willing to be merciful. "We will give them the chance to
turn away from the false path," he says. And what happens if they don't take
up the offer? "Then there will be confrontation," Abu Mustafa promises,
bringing his fists together. Still, he doesn't think it likely that the
Salafis will have to take up arms against Hamas. "It won't be necessary.
They will destroy themselves."
Power Struggle
His explanation is clear. "For many people in Gaza, Hamas embodied the
promise of a good, Islamic lifestyle," Abu Mustafa says. But once the group
seized power in the Gaza Strip over a year ago, many were disappointed. Of
the 10 defectors who call him everyday, many of them are Hamas fighters, he
claims. "These are tough men and they have insider knowledge. They will be
very useful should it come to a power struggle."
The group's greatest sin, says Abu Mustafa, who is also the father of two
children, is its effort to bring Islam and democracy together. "Hamas
represents an American style of Islam. They have tried to curry favor."
Which is not such a bad thing for Abu Mustafa and his Salafis. "Hamas is
like a block of ice in the sun," he says. "Every minute they get smaller --
and we get larger."
Abu Mustafa's broken leg and the scars on his right hand are the result of
an Israeli rocket attack. In January, he and a few of his comrades fired
rockets across the border into Israel. Afterwards, as they were heading
home, an Israeli missile hit them.
Four men were injured and one, as Abu Mustafa says, became a martyr. The
fact that his leg still hurts six months later is something he bears with
stoicism. "It is not important how one feels in this life, rather whether
one enters paradise or hell after death," he says.
For his part, Abu Mustafa claims he is not afraid of death. He says he is
not fighting for worldly things. And he hopes he will fall in the struggle
for his beliefs.
"On the other hand," he says before pushing himself up and limping back to
his car, "I would love to see my daughter wed. Maybe she will marry first,
and then I will become a martyr."
'Syria-Iran strategic alliance strong'
Jul. 18, 2008 Associated Press , THE JERUSALEM POST
www.jpost.com
/servlet/Satellite?cid=1215331014488&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
The "strategic alliance" between Syria and Iran is strong and will not be
shaken by the possibility of a peace treaty with Israel, Syrian Foreign
Minister Walid Moallem said Thursday.
Speaking at a press conference after meeting his Iranian counterpart,
Manouchehr Mottaki, in Damascus, Moallem said that Iran's peaceful intention
"was confirmed to us by our brothers in Iran."
Mottaki expressed Iran's support for Syria's aims in the Turkish-mediated
peace talks, namely the return of the Golan Heights, a strategic plateau
that Israel captured from Syria in the 1967 Mideast war.
"We support the Syrian president's stand in recovering the occupied land,"
Mottaki said.
Mottaki also briefed Syrian President Bashar Assad on the international
standoff over Iran's nuclear program.
The meeting in Damascus signaled Syria's willingness to act on a request by
French President Nicolas Sarkozy to try to help resolve the crisis by
pushing Iran to cooperate with the international community.
Mottaki welcomed a Syrian role in trying to ease the tension, Syria's
official SANA news agency reported. Speaking at a news conference, he added
that Iran has always kept the Syrians informed of developments in the
standoff with the United States and its European allies.
Sarkozy met with Syrian President Bashar Assad at a summit of European
nations and other countries bordering the Mediterranean Sea last weekend in
Paris. The French president asked Assad to step in and persuade Iran to
offer proof that it has no intention of developing nuclear weapons.
Iran's assurances that it only wants nuclear technology for the production
of energy have failed to quell suspicions that it is seeking a pathway to an
atomic bomb.
Assad promised to relay the request from France to Tehran, but expressed
doubts that his intervention would help, despite his country's close ties
with Iran.
On Thursday, Assad stressed his view that "dialogue and diplomacy are the
only way to settle this issue," SANA reported.
Hebrew University students indicted of trying to build terror infrastructure
in Jerusalem. One of suspects allegedly collected information in attempt to
shoot down helicopter carrying senior official during US President Bush's
visit to Israel
Efrat Weiss YNET Published: 07.18.08, 11:00 / Israel News
www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3569927,00.html
Cleared for publication: The Shin Bet and the police have arrested six
Israeli Arabs, four of them residents of east Jerusalem, on suspicion of
planning to operate an al-Qaeda cell in Israel.
Among the suspects are students at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem.
The six suspects were identified as: Ibrahim Nashef, 22, of Tayibe, a
physics and computer sciences student at the Hebrew University; Muhammas
Najem, 24, of Nazareth, a chemistry student at the Hebrew University; Yusef
Sumarin, 21, of the Jerusalem village of Beit Hanina; Anas Shawiki, 21, of
the Jerusalem town of Jabel Mukaber; Kamal Abu Kwaider, 22, of Jerusalem's
Old City; and Ahmed Shawiki, 21, of the Jerusalem town of Shuafat.
All the suspects were charged with membership in a terror organization. Some
of them will be tried for aiding the enemy at a time of war, possessing
propaganda material in favor of a terror organization, soliciting and
attempting to solicit others to join a terror organization.
According to the indictments filed against them Friday, the six used to meet
at the al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem. They surfed al-Qaeda websites containing
radical Islam content, where they also found instructions for the production
of explosive devices.
Taking an interest in Bush's chopper
One of the detainees lived in the Hebrew University dorms which overlook the
university's landing ground. According to the suspicions, he watched the
landing ground in January 2008, during US President George W. Bush's visit
to Israel.
He also allegedly looked for instructions for shooting down a landing
helicopter on the internet, and took pictures of the landing choppers using
his cellular phone.
The six were arrested in a joint police and Shin Bet operation between the
months of June and July.
About two weeks ago, two residents of the southern Israeli town of Rahat
were indicted Wednesday for allegedly being al-Qaeda operatives.
Taher and Omar Abu-Sakut, who are registered members of the Islamic
Movement, were arrested following a joint Shin Bet, police and Border Guard
operation that took place in June.
Raanan Ben-Zur contributed to this report morality as its guiding
principle."
On June 30, 2008, the Saudi English-language daily Arab News published an
article titled "Three Years of Reform and Progress" praising the
"unprecedented progress in economic, social, educational, health,
agricultural and industrial sectors" achieved by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
since the accession of King Abdullah bin 'Abd Al-'Aziz to the throne nearly
three years ago.(1)
In contrast with this rosy assessment, Omran Salman, editor-in-chief of the
liberal Arab website Aafaq, published an article on July 12, 2008 detailing
domestic Saudi developments since King 'Abdullah's accession to the throne
and describing the first years of his reign as a period of backsliding on
reform.
The following are excerpts:(2)
What Happened to the Hopes for Reform?
"With the approach of the third anniversary of the accession of Saudi
monarch King 'Abdullah bin 'Abd Al-'Aziz Aal Saud to the throne in the
summer of 2005, it appears that the great hopes for reform in connection
with him have dissipated, or are on the way to dissipating. An increasing
number of Saudi citizens and intellectuals are disappointed. And the events
of the past months and years demonstrate that the anti-reform wing within
the Saudi royal family has achieved clear gains.
"Painful blows have been directed at the reformist movement from all sides,
through the arrest and imprisonment of its leading personalities, and the
constraint and closing of its media and cultural platforms. At the same
time, the influence of the Wahhabi establishment and the hardliners has
increased, especially the Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and
Suppression of Vice.
"What has happened to bring about this result?"
An Encouraging Beginning, But...
"On August 1, 2005 the death of the previous Saudi monarch, King Fahd bin
'Abd Al-'Aziz, was announced. Under the system of familial succession
followed in Saudi Arabia, as in the other Gulf countries, the crown prince,
'Abdullah bin 'Abd Al-'Aziz, was crowned king.
"Until that time, King Abdullah was viewed in many Western and Saudi circles
as a reformist, distinguished by open-mindedness and by the encouraging of
modernization and development in the Kingdom. [It was thought] that his
assuming the leadership of the country would advance the agenda of political
reform and minority and women's [issues].
"King 'Abdullah himself sought to reinforce this impression. In 2004, he
said to journalists, regarding the controversy over the role of women in the
Kingdom, that "the march of reform in Saudi Arabia is continuing, but step
by step."(3)
"In 2007 King 'Abdullah said in an interview with the Frankfurter Allgemeine
Zeitung that 'the Kingdom will continue its political reforms consistent
with the nature of life and the requirements of the times, which require
movement, change, and renewal for the better, Allah willing'.(4)
"To give credibility to his reformist orientation, King 'Abdullah began his
era by pardoning three of the most prominent proponents of constitutional
reform and civil [society] - the academics Dr. Matrouk Faleh and Dr.
Abdullah Al-Hamed, and the poet 'Ali Al-Doumaini - after they had served 18
months of sentences originally set at 10 years, for having called for the
transformation of Saudi Arabia into a constitutional monarchy and for their
initiative in writing a draft Islamic constitution. They were barred from
travel after their release.
"Likewise, when King 'Abdullah was crown prince, in June of 2003, he hosted
a national conference of a kind unprecedented in the Kingdom, including
clergy from among the Shi'a, the Sunnis, and Sufis. Thirty-five clergymen of
different Islamic orientations participated. A number of activists from the
Shi'ite minority commented that this was the first time they had received
official recognition from the Saudi government.
"The Saudi press saw a broader scope for freedom of expression in the era of
the new monarch. This was especially pronounced in the Al-Watan and
Al-Riyadh newspapers, which witnessed a diversity of views and bold
commentary, and included some liberals and feminists."
The Loss of Momentum for Reform
"But there has been no fundamental change on the key issues for reform.
Although the National Dialogue, which was initiated by King Abdullah when he
was crown prince, has continued through seven rounds and has convened in
different regions of the Kingdom, it has been emptied of content. It has
accomplished nothing on the ground, and over time has been transformed into
meetings for exchanging stories and for issuing recommendations, none of
which have been carried out.
"Likewise, the recommendations of the participants in the first session of
the Dialogue have not seen the light. At the conclusion of the conference
they had called for an increased pace of political reform in the Kingdom,
broadened political participation through the election of the Shura Council
(Consultative Council) and regional councils, and encouraging the
establishment of unions, voluntary organizations and institutions of civil
society. And they had called for increased political participation and the
just distribution of resources in the country.
"The Saudi leadership has developed no mechanisms to involve the Shi'ite
minority or the new classes of liberals and technocrats in decision making.
"Despite the increasing demands on the part of Saudi feminist activists to
give women their basic rights, like the right to drive a car, the Saudi
leadership has persisted in its rejection [of these demands], arguing that
Saudi society is conservative and will not accept the concept of women
driving their cars by themselves. Nonetheless, in 1955 this society accepted
girls' participation in formal education, thanks to the insistence of the
Saudi leadership at that time, and despite society's initial rejection."
The Campaign Against the Reformist Movement
"However, the most marked development, as far as the retreat on reforms is
concerned, has been the unprecedented campaign of arrests and harassment of
advocates of reform of various orientations, which was undertaken by the
Saudi authorities on the direct orders of Interior Minister Prince Nayef.
The campaign reached its peak in 2007 and continues until now.
"On Monday, May 19, 2008, Saudi public security forces raided King Saud
University in Riyadh, and arrested and imprisoned the well-known reformist
Dr. Matrouk Al-Faleh. The authorities gave no explanation and did not
announce any specific charges, but it is believed that the arrest resulted
from his visit to the lawyer and former academic, 'Abdullah Al-Hamed. Dr.
Al-Hamed is one of the leading figures in constitutional reform in Saudi
Arabia, and with his brother, Eissa, is being held in the prison in
Buraidah.
"On Sunday, May 18, 2008, following his visit to Abdullah Al-Hamed, Al-Falih
issued a statement on a number of websites criticizing the Saudi judicial
system and the poor conditions in prison.(5)
"In November 2007. Al-Hamed and his brother Eissa were sentenced to several
months' imprisonment for having encouraged a group of women to demonstrate
at Interior Ministry buildings in Buraidah over the imprisonment of their
husbands and brothers without charges. After their appeal was rejected, they
themselves entered prison in March, 2008.
"This past May 5, the Saudi public prosecutor charged the prominent liberal
activist Ra'if Badawi with 'establishing a website offensive to Islam,'
calling on the court to sentence him to five years in prison and to fine him
3,000,000 Saudi riyals (about US$800,000).
"The prosecutor had detained Badawi for one day in May to interrogate him
about his website 'Saudi Liberals,' on which he details human rights abuses
committed by the Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of
Vice and criticizes the dominant interpretation of Islam in the Kingdom. He
was asked to shut down the website. After being threatened and imprisoned
for his online activities, Badawi had to flee Saudi Arabia for an
undisclosed location.
"Likewise, Saudi authorities arrested the well-known blogger Fouad Al-Farhan
(known as 'the father of the Saudi bloggers') in December of 2007, and held
him in prison for four months. He was not charged, but it is thought that
his arrest was due to his having shown up the official narrative that tried
to pin terrorism charges on some imprisoned reformists.
"In February, 2007, Saudi security forces raided the villa of Saudi lawyer
'Issam Basrawi in Jeddah, arresting him and five of the most prominent
advocates for reform. Soon afterward, four others were arrested in Jeddah
and Medina. The 10 are lawyers, doctors, and university professors, and one
is a former judge.
"Except for Basrawi, who was released for health reasons, the arrested men
remain in prison without having been formally charged.
"Saudi security forces arrested reformist activist Muhammad Al-Bajadi on
Wednesday, January 9, 2008, in Buraidah, in the north of the Kingdom.
"Others who have not been arrested have been subjected to threats and
persecution. 'Abd Al-Karim bin Yousef Al-Khidr, a well-known reformist and
professor of comparative jurisprudence in the Faculty of Shari'a at
Al-Qassim University, has complained of harassment and threats from the
security agencies. In an April 28, 2008 statement, Al-Khidr, who is also the
head of the defense team of the imprisoned reformists Abdullah and Eissa
Al-Hamed, said that suspicious persons and cars have menaced him and his
family in the city of Buraidah, in Al-Qassim province.
"The campaign to silence reformist voices has extended to Saudi writers who
have regularly criticized fundamentalism.
"The liberal Saudi writer and academic Muhammad bin 'Ali Al-Mahmoud said on
November 4, 2007 that the council of Al-Qassim University had, under
pressure from extremists, issued a decision removing him from teaching in
the Arabic language department, and transferring him to administrative work,
'fearing for the beliefs of the students, from what they regard as the
deviant and idiosyncratic ideas in his lectures to which he exposes
them'."(6)
Increased Influence of the Wahhabi Establishment
"In tandem with the security campaign against reformists, the influence of
the Wahhabi establishment - and of its instrument for the domination of
Saudi society, the Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of
Vice - have increased.(7)
"It is believed that the support the Commission receives from the hard-line
wing of the Saudi royal family has protected it from many pressures,
including calls by many Saudi intellectuals and writers for its abolition or
the regulation of its activities.
"In his speech at the conclusion of the first 'Awareness Conference,' held
under the slogan 'The Best Nation'(8) and organized by the Commission for
the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice, the Emir of Riyadh, Prince
Salman bin 'Abd Al-'Aziz, said that the Saudi government had given the
Commission the authority and capacity to apply force to change evil
behavior, and that [the commandment of] promoting virtue and preventing vice
'is almost one of the pillars of Islam.'(9)
"Likewise, Saudi Minister of the Interior Prince Nayef bin 'Abd Al-'Aziz
defended the Commission against the calls for its abolition, saying, 'the
[commandment of the] promoting virtue and preventing vice is a pillar of
Islam.' He added, in comments after a meeting with the Shura Council on July
1, 2007, 'if we are Muslims we must know this, and if not, this is not a
homeland for non-Muslims.'(10)
"And in an open meeting in the Islamic University in Madina, the president
of the Saudi Shura Council, Dr. Salih bin Humaid, defended the hard-line
clergy, saying, 'There are some who intend to be cautious so as to avert
deleterious consequences, and others want to make things easy for the
people, and both seek exoneration from guilt.' And he denied that there is
something called 'tolerant Islam,' insisting that 'Islam is Islam.'(11)
"Instead of loosening the the Wahhabi establishment's grip on society, it
appears that the hard-line wing has decided to bestow new roles on its
struggle against change, reform and modernization.
"This June, a conference of different Islamic sects was convened in Mecca,
with a large number of Sunni and Shi'ite clergy in attendance, at the
invitation of the Saudi monarch King Abdullah, who [himself] opened the
inaugural session. A few days before the conference was to open, on June 5,
22 high-ranking members of the Wahhabi establishment, headed by two the most
prominent sheikhs, Abdullah bin 'Abd Al-Rahman Al-Jebreen and 'Abd Al-Rahman
bin Nasir Al-Barrak, issued a sharply worded statement declaring that the
Shi'a are infidels and warning the Sunni world against rapprochement with
the Shi'a. It was clearly the objective of the declaration to disrupt the
conference and cause its failure.(12)
"Likewise, the same group has regularly issued statements declaring other
Islamic sects and [followers of] other religions to be infidels, in addition
to inciting fighting in Iraq and supporting hard-line Islamic movements like
Hamas.
"And this year, the Wahhabi establishment inaugurated a vicious campaign
against liberal Saudi writers and intellectuals. The most serious attack was
the issuing of a fatwa by prominent Wahhabi cleric 'Abd Al-Rahman Al-Barrak
against two Saudi liberal journalists from the Al-Riyadh daily newspaper,
Yousef Aba Al-Khail and 'Abdullah bin Bjad Al-Otaibi - declaring them
apostates and calling for their killing over articles they had published in
the paper.(13)
"Likewise, a member of the Superior Commission of 'Ulama' and member of the
Saudi Standing Committee for Scientific Research and the Issuing of Fatwas,
Sheikh Salih bin Fawzan Al-Fawzan, launched a strong attack on liberals,
stripping them of their [tie] to Islam and expressing his view that 'anyone
who claims that he is a liberal Muslim is in a state of contradiction, and
must repent to God to be a Muslim in fact.'(14)
"Harsh criticism directed by some hard-liners in the Wahhabi establishment
against the Riyadh International Book Fair (March 4, 2008) led to the Saudi
authorities' confiscation of a large number of Saudi and other Arab books
and novels, on the charge that they were propagating '...Judaism,
Christianity, Buddhism, Sufism, Ismailism, occult doctrines, Shi'ism,
Ibadism, and the Druze religion.'(15)
"And the matter did not end here. The Wahhabi establishment has extended its
surveillance and its authority to business establishments that employ women,
and to attacking universities and educational institutions on the charge of
'mixing' [of the sexes].
"A study conducted by IPSOS, an organization that measures public opinion,
on behalf of the Sayyida Khadeejah bint Khuwailed Center (part of the Jeddah
Chamber of Commerce and Industry) found that 58% of business establishments
complained of opposition by local bodies, and first and foremost by the
Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice, to the
employment of women in the private sector, causing some of these firms to
hesitate before employing more women.
"The executive director of the Khadeejah bint Kuwailed Center, Ms. Basma
Umair, said that 'these companies complained in particular of the frequency
with which members of the Commission visit their company, intimidating the
female employees, and making them feel professional insecurity and
instability.'(16)
"On Thursday, June 12, 2008 a group of hard-line clergy in Saudi Arabia led
by the hard-line cleric 'Abd 'Al-Rahman Al-Barrak launched an attack on the
King Saud bin 'Abd Al-'Aziz University for the Health Sciences for allowing
a 'mixed' reception of male and female graduates, and criticized Effat
College, a girls' school, for organizing a female basketball tournament. The
statement by the group of clergy, published on the 'Shabakat Nour Al-Islam'
website (http://www.islamlight.net) said, 'We condemn this activity and call
upon those who perpetrated it to repent ... and not to repeat something like
this.' And the signatories to the letter demanded that the 'authorities
punish those who want to drag this Nation into the infernal depths of
Westernization.'"
The Truth about King Abdullah's Reform Project
"Many observers inside and outside Saudi Arabia are asking themselves why
the Saudi monarch has been unable to advance the process of reform, open up
the political system to Saudi citizens, and put an end to the shameful
practices of the Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of
Vice."
First Hypothesis: The Saudi King Was Never a Reformer
"One of the hypotheses is that, from the beginning, the Saudi monarch did
not in fact have a reformist project - or, that the reform he was talking
about was different from what Saudi reformists were calling for. While the
reformists were calling for political reforms on the model of democratic
countries, with free elections, an elected parliament, an independent
judiciary, the rule of law, and the separation of powers - [though] with the
preservation of the distinctive features of Saudi identity and its
particularity - King Abdullah, for his part, understood reform as the
development of some of the administrative and political agencies in a way
that would not anger people of influence in the royal family and the Wahhabi
establishment.
"The Saudi researcher Fouad Ibrahim says that 'the gamble on the
hypothetical reformist role of King Abdullah was proven wrong when he passed
in silence over the arbitrary arrests of leaders of the reformist tendency
in 2004. And, as for the formal reformist measures that he announced later,
they should be classified in the context of sugar-coating Saudi Arabia's
image abroad.'
"And he adds, 'The word "reform" has been replaced with "development," in
order to give this stage the appearance of a nationalist reformist message,
and King Abdullah decided to give free rein to the desires of the Sudairi
branch of the royal family in restricting reformist activity.'(17)